Rising Tide: Katrina and the Flood of 1927 · 382 words posted 09/01/2005 10:38 AM

Today’s New York Times compared the destruction left in Katrina’s wake to the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake, but in terms of both the scope and nature of the disaster the Great Mississippi Flood of 1927 is the closer match.

John M. Barry writes about the Flood and its effects in Rising Tide: The Great Mississippi Flood of 1927 and How It Changed America. Then, as now, poor African-Americans bore the brunt of the flood’s punishment. According to Barry, the flood changed America in at least four notable ways:

Barry’s book is as relevant today as when it was published in 1997, even if it’s a discouraging read.

Some commentators on the left have been quick to assign blame to the Bush administration for under-funding levee improvements in 2004. Likewise, Republicans have decried any mention of politics while the floodwaters linger in New Orleans. While calling on Americans to “rise above politics” when responding to disaster may seem noble, such calls are ahistorical and utterly naive. If history is any guide, politicians will scramble for gain at the expense of disadvantaged constituent groups: primarily the poor urban African-Americans and rural whites who suffered the most from both Katrina and the Flood of 1927.

Some things never change.

* * *


1. On Sep 4, 02:08 AM smokeonit said:
what should the consequences be? to leave the south and go up north? what should the poor do??? #

2. On Sep 4, 09:07 PM subhero said:
“george bush doesn’t care about black people!”

to influence people’s perception and opinion by deliberately falsifying media coverage is called propaganda.
obeying governmental power by post-editing publicly stated opinions is called censorship.
a system administrating those means is called fascist.

the historic parallels to this are everywhere… #

3. On Sep 8, 07:07 AM since1968 said:
subhero, I’m not sure you’re looking for a response… #

4. On Sep 9, 12:39 AM Rick Baxter said:
I understand. r. #